The Thin Line between Character Strengths and Flaws
Last time I asked you to share your superpower, that trait—useful or not—that makes you unique. Everyone shared some great stories, although none of us had skills that would land us on Cracked.com’s “Real People with Mind-Blowing Mutant Superpowers” list. *eyes the superpowers that made the list* Maybe that’s a good thing.
At the end of that post, I mentioned that our characters should have unique strengths and flaws as well, but I didn’t get a chance to fully dig into that idea. Serena Yung brought up a “superpower” in the comments that reminded me of a character development trick along those lines. Serena said:
“I’m able to get extremely, heads-over-heels obsessed with something, e.g. writing, or pokemon, or psychology, that I can keep talking about this same topic for a VERY long time. … Maybe this is more of a (super) weakness than a superpower though, because these obsessions can get me “stuck in a rut”…”
Hmm… “Maybe this is more of a (super) weakness than a superpower…” Serena touched on an interesting truth: Character traits can be both a strength and a weakness.
Develop Character Flaws through Their Strengths
Strengths and flaws are often two sides of the same coin. Interference is often the “bad” side of helpfulness, control can be the bad side of protectiveness, obsession can result from love, etc. The intentions and motivations for both sides can be identical.
This fact gives us another method for developing our characters. Often when we talk about the change a character goes through during a story arc, we think about an actual change from trait “a” to trait “b.” A character goes from distrusting to trusting, insecure to secure, and so forth.
However, if we’re having trouble thinking up a flaw for a character, we can look at their strengths. Maybe one of those strengths can start at the “bad” end and work its way to being good.
In that case, their character arc would be less about a change from one trait to another and more about a different perspective on the same behavior or attitude. Instead of changing from “a” to “b,” they’d change from trait “a” to trait “A” with a capital letter.
Echo the Hero and Villain with Extremism
We can use a similar technique to echo the character traits of the hero and the villain. Stories where the hero and villain have only one degree of separation can be very powerful and carry deep themes of the line between good and bad.
For these stories, we’d look at a strength (which could also be the beginning flaw) of the hero. We’d then take that strength and carry it to its extreme negative end to create the villain.
Every good intention can go bad if carried to the extreme. The line between a little bit extreme and a lot extreme can be the difference between a hero and a villain.
I have one story where the heroine is a pawn between two powerful people. They both have the ability to control her, but one restrains his controlling nature and the other embraces it. Guess which is the hero and which is the villain? *smile*
Stories like that allow us to examine how the trait or ability itself isn’t “bad.” As with so many things in life, it all comes down to how that aspect is used—or abused.
Another fun approach is to have heroes and villains with the same goal. The difference lies in how they plan to achieve that goal and how far they’re willing to go, believing that the end justifies the means.
As many of my own stories attest, I have a fondness for books that explore these nuances. Those are the kind of “shades of gray” I like. *grin*
Registration is currently open for my two workshops designed for those with no knowledge of WordPress, websites, or blogs. Interested? Sign up for only one of the workshops: For a free website/blog: “Develop a Free Author Website in 60 Minutes (or Less!)”; or to set up a website/blog you own: “A Newbie’s Guide to Building a Self-Hosted Blog or Website.” (Blog readers: Use Promo Code “jamisave” to save $5 on registration.)
Also, a reminder that I’ll be holding a one-hour live Q&A session about all things WordPress today, Thursday, April 11th, at 7 p.m. Eastern time on the WANA International Facebook page. Come pick my brain! *smile*
Have you used the technique of turning a strength into a flaw before? What about echoing the hero and the villain through the level of their extremism? Do your heroes and villains ever have the same goal? Can you think of other ways to use strengths and flaws for character development?
Pin It
Love this post, Jami! I love what I call “morally ambiguous” characters. They might do the right thing for the wrong reason, or the wrong thing for a reason that seems right to them. My current “villain” is a really nasty SOB but, for all that, the things he’s trying to accomplish are not bad–he wants to protect and strengthen his species, and he wants to slow human intrusion into wildlife habitat. But the ways he goes about achieving those things are partly a product of his flawed culture and partly because, well, he’s a real SOB. But there are definite shades of gray there, and I think that makes him interesting.
Hi Suzanne,
Yes! I love those moral ambiguities. 🙂
Thanks for sharing your example! That’s a perfect peek at how our villains can have good goals and motivations and yet be an awful person. I can’t wait to read that story. 🙂 Thanks for the comment!
Yay! I’m very happy that you found my comment useful, lol. Anyway, interesting. I didn’t exactly think of a quality being both a strength and a flaw. It does seem to be true that any good trait taken to an extreme can become bad, that “goodness” depends on moderation but—I’m just wondering if there are any traits where the extremes are “good” but the moderate forms are “bad.” Hmmm, I can think of something where the more you have it, the more “good” it is, i.e. you can never get too much of it. E.g. perhaps kindness/ benevolence? I guess in theory, the kinder you are, the more moral and “good” you will be judged? (As long as your kindness doesn’t turn into intrusiveness or overhelpfulness…) Apart from that, hmmm…let me think of more examples/ traits. Oh there’s another trait that I recently learned about in psychology (yes, I’m such a psych fan, lol). It’s about “integrative complexity”. A more “integratively complex” person will have more moderate views on things (e.g. on politics or controversial social issues), being able to see and understand the value of both sides of the argument, or even make a compromise between the two sides. An “integratively simple” person has more black and white, radical views. In general, we tend to see the “integratively complex” as superior to the simple, but here’s an instance where the Int. complex is actually not that good: During (or after? I forgot) the American Civil War, there were more… — Read More »
Hi Serena,
Interesting question. It probably all depends on perspective–which was partly the point I was making about changing from trait “a” to trait “A.” 🙂
Going back to my original thought, I can think of a couple of different ways kindness/benevolence could be pushed to a bad extreme. Someone can be so kind and compassionate about others that they neglect themselves. Someone could have the goal of pushing benevolence but take the method of forcing it (legislating charity, etc.).
Ooo, fascinating example about the complex vs. the simple. Yes, I can see that. I’d consider myself an integratively complex person, but also very opinionated. LOL! However, I do try to see other sides and not force my viewpoint on others–in cases where there isn’t necessarily a right and wrong. So where moral attitudes are in flux, I might be judged after the fact to have been too understanding. Interesting! 🙂 Thanks for the comment!
Oh I thought of another instance where a flaw can become a strength. It’s kind of a weird example though.
When you’re in love with someone, everything they do, everything they are, is beautiful. So if I were in love with so-and-so, then little flaws he shows, (e.g. too stubborn, often moody, or sometimes quite forgetful), will simply be “cute” to me. I.e. “flaws” (if they are not egregious) make the person you’re in love with “even more perfect” because it makes them “even more endearing.” You can imagine another lover thinking, “Oh she’s so perfect in every way…but then she very easily loses her temper, but aw! She’s so ADORABLE when she’s angry! ^^ Her flaws make me love her even more than I already do!”
In other words, little flaws in our beloveds may make them even lovelier than they already are, because they make this perfect person more human, approachable, and lovable.
Haha, so that was the fun example about how flaws can turn into strengths. ^^ Ah, the power of love. XP (And of course, these beloveds were only “perfect” in the eyes of their lovers, not necessarily truly perfect.)
Hi Serena,
LOL! I love it! And you’re right about how lovers see each other. 🙂
Deciding someone is “the one” often comes down to finding someone whose flaws make them “cuter” to you rather than annoy you. 🙂 Thanks for the comment!
I completely agree. For instance, bravery might be a “super-power,” but impulsiveness or foolhardiness could be the other side of that coin. When writing YA characters, I think a bit of rashness is expected.
Hi Lexa,
Great example! Yes, the line between bravery and foolhardiness can be very thin indeed. 🙂 Thanks for the comment!
It can also be fun to give the character a flaw that ends up working to their benefit.
For example, in A Fistful of Fire, the narrator’s instinct is to flee danger. She’s paranoid, so that means she runs from a lot of things that really aren’t all that dangerous—but that instinct is what’s kept her alive this long (because her temper would’ve gotten her killed, had she ever dared display it) and it’s what helps her “win” at the end of the story.
Everyone has types of situations that best suit them. Some stories require characters to fit the situations; most seem to require that the major characters don’t quite fit. And then some require for the characters to not fit at all.
^_^
Hi Carradee,
LOL! I love that her instinct has kept her from pissing people off with her temper. That’s fabulous. 🙂
Good point! Depending on the story, we might want our characters to not quite fit or to not fit at all. In many cases, that “not quite fitting” aspect could be a result of their entering a literal or figurative “new world” after the first plot point. Thanks for sharing and for the comment!
[…] Gold: The Thin Line between Character Strengths and Flaws. Excerpt: “Strengths and flaws are often two sides of the same coin. Interference is often […]
Taking a character’s strength and turning it into a flaw? What. A. Concept!! I don’t believe I’ve *intentionally* done this before, but when I think about it, I’ve used this technique and never really realized it. *smacks head* LOL!
I haven’t echoed the hero and villain in their extremism though. Now THAT is something I’ll have to consciously look at when I’m plotting the next project.
Your posts on the writing craft are truly awesome. Thank you for another great post, Jami! 🙂
Hi Melinda,
Aww, thanks! Let me know if you use that hero/villain echoing technique. 🙂 Thanks for the comment!
[…] time, we talked about using our characters’ strengths to develop their flaws. But I didn’t get a chance to talk about how we could figure out the matching flaw for a […]
[…] Jami Gold’s article on Character Strength and Flaws […]
[…] tips for creating sympathetic characters point out that our characters need flaws. And that’s very […]
[…] When we write, we try to give our characters both strengths and flaws. Giving our characters a mixture makes them seem more real, more three-dimensional. Finding a balance often means exploring the thin line between strengths and flaws. […]
Another fun approach is to have heroes and villains with the same goal. The difference lies in how they plan to achieve that goal and how far they’re willing to go, believing that the end justifies the means.”
– This reminds me of my first question on this site, when I asking about how the goals of the villain can be similar to the heroes’. Yeah, I’m still struggling with that. Arrrrrrgh…
To create morally ambiguous villains, one have to give them ample screentime, shouldn’t it? But it’s just… I dunno, lessens the suspense on who the real villain is (I’m writing some sort of suspense/mystery thing)?
Also, on an unrelated note, is there some feature where I can get an email/notification when you answer a post?
Thanks~!
Hi Lost-chan,
I struggle with that same issue of how to create a deep villain when they don’t get much page time. Unfortunately, I’m not sure I have an answer for that. LOL!
As you said, how much we want to follow the villain around can be dependent on the genre. At the same time, various genres have different expectations for the development of the villain. So maybe the best thing we can do is read widely in our genre to understand the expectations (as well as the techniques for how others find the right balance).
As for your question about comments, at this time, my site doesn’t have that feature. The reasons are complicated and very tech-related and beyond me. I have some ideas about how to try to make that happen, but…time. 😉 I understand though–it annoys me that it’s not automatic too. Thanks for the comment!
[…] I’ve mentioned before, there’s sometimes a thin line between strengths and flaws. Any alpha trait could be good or bad, a strength or a flaw, depending on how extreme of a level […]
[…] develop character flaw to overcome […]