In some circles, there’s a debate over identifying the protagonist in certain stories, such as The Great Gatsby. Is Nick Carraway the protagonist because he’s the narrator and every aspect of the story reflects his point of view? Or is Jay Gatsby the protagonist because he drives the events of the story (leaving Nick as simply the observant vehicle for the tale)?
We won’t delve into that debate here. *smile* But by default, the protagonist is defined as the main character, the hero, the lead—the character driving the story forward.
In fact, a common complaint by editors and agents is that some submissions feature a too-passive main character, one who reacts to events but doesn’t have agency and take action. In other words, for most stories, the main character is expected to be more than a mere observer.
That said, we might sometimes worry if our main character is strong enough, unique enough, active enough to be worthy of the label protagonist. We might wonder if our story would be better told through another character’s eyes. Or we might debate which of our major characters should be the lead, the one behind the story arc.
Last month, Ella left a comment on one of my older posts asking how we can make sure the main character is acting like a protagonist:
“Even though my MC has the passion and personality and traits to be the main character—there’s no reason for her specifically to be the lead, and someone else could be in that position instead and not much would change. I don’t want to replace her, though, because she *is* unique and would lose a lot if she walked away. Would you mind telling me what I can do, especially since I want it to be a character-driven story?”
So let’s talk about how we can ensure our main character deserves the protagonist label…
Point of View Does Not Indicate Character Importance
Before we dig in, I want to make a couple of points. First, in many genres, the protagonist isn’t the only point of view (POV) character used throughout the story.
Thrillers and mysteries sometime include scenes from the victim or the villain’s POV to increase tension. Romances frequently include POV scenes from each party of the relationship. Character-ensemble stories (from fantasy to family saga) might bounce from one POV character to another—think Game of Thrones.
In a previous post about how many characters is “too many,” I differentiated between protagonists and other major characters with POV scenes:
- Protagonists usually have a full arc over the course of the story. They have goals and change in some way to attempt to overcome the obstacles.
- They typically “make things happen” during the story, and their driving of the plot is often their purpose in the story (i.e., the protagonist’s purpose for being in the story is one and the same as the story goals).
- Much (if not all) of the story is told from their POV.
- Some genres (such as the romance genre) have two protagonists, but most have only one protagonist. (However, even in dual protagonist story lines, one protagonist typically drives the story more. One character’s arc might be stronger than the other, or one’s goals might be more directly tied to the plot and overall story than the other.)
Characters with POV Scenes:
- Some stories include scenes from multiple POVs, some from major characters and some from minor characters.
- A non-protagonist character—no matter how major—might not have what we’d typically call an “arc” (with a sense of change), but if they have a POV scene, we’d usually include at least a hint of their goals (even if they fail abruptly with their death at the end of the scene).
- The arc of these non-protagonist characters might not continue throughout the entire story, but instead stop and start as needed for the plot.
- These characters may or may not “make things happen” during the story. If they do make things happen, their actions often directly affect the protagonist.
- The story purpose of these POV characters depends on the genre, but they typically fulfill a goal that’s smaller than the story at large.
Just because a character gets POV scenes
doesn’t mean they’re automatically the protagonist.
Leadership Does Not Indicate Character Importance
Secondly, the wording of Ella’s question alludes to several assumptions we might make about protagonists that we should examine:
- “there’s no reason for her specifically to be the lead”
I’m not sure what Ella meant by “the lead,” but I want to take the opportunity to clarify that just because a character is our lead character, that doesn’t mean they have to be the leader among a group of characters. Stories sometimes feature a protagonist (lead character) who is a sidekick to a group’s leader, or maybe even an outcast.
So our protagonist needs to be strong enough to lead the reader, but they don’t have to be the leader of others within the story.
- “someone else could be in that position instead and not much would change”
It then follows that the plot might not change if a different character leads the group. This isn’t a cause for alarm. *smile* If it doesn’t feel natural for our protagonist to lead a group of characters, we shouldn’t try to force them.
Our story is more than just a collection of external plot events that characters navigate. Our story is about the struggle, and each character’s journey through that struggle is likely to be unique, so a different POV character as the protagonist would change the story, as the journey itself would be different.
Just because a character isn’t a leader
doesn’t mean they’re too weak to drive the story.
How Can We Tell Who the “True” Protagonist Is?
If neither POV or being a leader indicates who the protagonist must be, what factor can we use to determine whether our main character is “strong enough”? How can we figure out whose story is this?
We can ask ourselves:
- Which character drives the story with a stronger arc or with goals directly tied to the plot and/or overall story? (In some cases of multiple-protagonist stories, one might own the external arc while the other owns the internal arc.)
- Which character “owns” the final conflict? The climax of the story is typically the point of the story, so whichever character is central to that conflict is closer to the point of the story goals.
- Which character has the most at stake to overcome the antagonistic forces? Who’s keeping the story progressing because the consequences force them to not give up?
Great! But all that can sound very external-plot focused, and many stories focus on internal arcs (as Jeff Lyons encouraged in his guest post last month). So while a group of characters might share stakes and consequences and conflicts for an external plot, we might look at these above questions differently for a character-driven story.
For an internal arc, usually the person who changes the most would be the one “driving” the story. Big, end-of-the-world stakes might be driving the group, but this character with the internal arc likely has personal stakes as well, forcing them to change more than the others.
If the story has an internal focus, the concept of drive can also apply to internal change rather than just pushing along external events. So for a character-focused story, where we want a strong internal arc for one of our characters, that character with the internal journey is the protagonist. Automatically.
In those types of stories, the point of the story isn’t about the external events—the plot is there simply to push them to change. Instead, the reason the story exists—the purpose of the story—is to share their struggle and their journey as they learn and grow.
How Can We Strengthen Our Protagonist & Make Them “Worthy”?
Now that we hopefully know our true protagonist, let’s get back to the issue of making sure they’re as strong of a character as they can be. As I mentioned above, they don’t have to be the leader among our characters, but they do need to lead the reader through our story.
How can we make sure our protagonist is a worthy leader for readers to follow?
- Think about why we care about our protagonist—do we have that reason on the page to encourage readers to care as well?
- Have we developed our protagonist’s motivations for why they do what they do—their deepest desires, goals, fears, stakes, flaws, backstory wounds, false beliefs, etc.?
- Have we shown those elements on the page in such a way that readers will root for our protagonist to succeed—even if they’re an antihero?
- Does our protagonist experience setbacks that encourage readers to feel sympathy or empathy?
- Does our protagonist have flaws readers can relate to? (A flawed character is more relatable than a perfect one.)
- Do we let readers closer to our protagonist by showing their vulnerability?
- Does our protagonist have any redeeming qualities (even antiheroes can be funny, brave, etc.) encouraging readers to root for them?
- Does our protagonist express themselves in ways that keep readers’ attention (interesting voice, unique perspective, etc.)?
- Have we given readers reasons to root for our protagonist over our antagonist?
- Most stories should include personal stakes for our protagonist, especially if our protagonist is just one of many major characters—have we given them personal stakes above and beyond any stakes driving others?
If readers feel compelled to listen to our protagonist, or they like or care about the protagonist enough to root for them, they’re following our character’s lead. And that’s a worthy trait for our protagonist—no matter what’s going on with the plot. *smile*
Have you written stories where you worried whether you had the right protagonist? What made you doubt whether they were the right character for the job? How did you finally decide? Or if you haven’t decided yet, does this help? What makes a character feel worthy of the protagonist label to you?Pin It