Writing Rule #1: There Is No “One Right Way”
Every once in a while, I come across a blog post or a workshop description that makes me want to warn newbie writers away. The problem usually lies with the author/presenter’s insistence that their way is the best way, or in some cases, the only way.
The truth is that we all have to find what works best for us. We each have a unique brain (er, mine is possibly unique-slash-insane *smile*), and just because someone’s method works for them doesn’t guarantee it’ll work for us. There is no one right way.
Those of us who have been writing for a while usually know this truth already. But new writers don’t.
The Danger for New Writers
New writers are often desperate for advice that will guide them through the learning curve. I know I was. That makes them vulnerable to those who insist that there is a One Right Way—their way.
I’ve seen multi-published authors who plot their story insist that pantsing (writing by the seat of our pants) is asking for a mess of a story that will have to be deleted. In fact, one of my favorite writing books (Story Engineering by Larry Brooks) takes this attitude.
I’m experienced enough to ignore those sections as “you don’t know what the heck you’re talking about” blather, and I love Larry’s advice about story structure enough that I’m willing to overlook those sections. But when I recommend the book, I often include a caution about his anti-pantsing bias.
Bias Is Not Fact
New writers don’t know what’s a fact and what’s a bias. I fell into that trap myself. When I first became serious about writing, I thought I had to plot because that’s what all the advice said. Plotting was what Serious Writers did. Period.
So even though I’d successfully pantsed my Harry Potter fan fiction story, I plotted and completed my first original novel. Great! But it had no voice, emotions, motivations, etc. The story was a puppet to my outline. My experiment didn’t fail in a fireball of burning words, but the story wasn’t what it could have been either.
Then my muse took over and I successfully pantsed the next story. This one had a glorious voice and worked in all respects. Ta-da! Now I knew that pantsing works for me and was not a guarantee of failure.
In other words, Larry’s attitude toward pantsing is a bias—not a fact. Will pantsing work for everyone? No. Just as much as plotting won’t work for everyone. But will pantsing work for some? Absolutely.
(I’m sorry for picking on plotters about this, but I can’t think of a single time I’ve seen a pantser take this “my way or the highway” attitude. However, I’ve seen it from plotters more times than I can count. Maybe the offenses from the “other side” just stand out to me more? *grin*)
What Should New Writers Do?
New writers (or heck, experienced writers—what works for us on one story might not work on another) should experiment. We won’t know what methods will work for us until we try.
Then, once we know something works for us, we shouldn’t doubt our methods just because someone says theirs is “better” or the “right way.” Sometimes ignoring our self-doubt is easier said than done, but maybe reminding ourselves that there is no one right way will help.
Just looking at the pantser-plotter continuum, there are several methods we can adjust from story to story. Other writing endeavors like editing, synopsis writing, query writing, marketing, social media, etc. will all have multiple approaches as well.
To give you an idea of the variety of methods we should feel allowed to experiment with, I can think of the following elements we might know at the start of a first draft along the pantser-plotter continuum and still successfully complete a story:
- Only a first line (not even a premise)
- A hook
- A brief character description and a mannerism or quirk
- A character’s backstory
- In-depth character descriptions (with or without a plot)
- An opening scene/situation
- A theme
- A core conflict
- The “point of no return”
- The Climax (related to premise)
- Character arc
- A back-cover blurb
- The big four plot turning points (story arc)
- All the main plot/character turning points (beat sheet)
- A brief (2-5 page) synopsis
- A chapter outline
- A scene-by-scene outline
- A detailed (20+ pages) synopsis
- Scene cards with a summary, information about setting, POV, scene arc, goal, motivation, etc.
That doesn’t even count the methods for how to write:
- in the morning
- in the evening
- use NaNo, #1K1hr, and support from other writers
- while waiting between errands vs. only in big chunks
- x number of pages/words/hours a day
- linearly vs. non-linearly, etc.
I hope new writers reading this get the idea that there’s too much variety—with too much evidence of success all around (I’ve used about half of the first list and tried everything on the second)—to accept that one way is better than the rest. One way might be better for us, but not better for every writer and every story.
What Can Experienced Writers Do?
Those of us with experience can watch our messaging. We can make sure we’re not advocating a “this way is better” attitude. We can share our varied experiences to add to the advice available. We can suggest “if this way doesn’t work for you, feel free to try x too” when we see new writers listening to others with that attitude.
When we’re experienced enough to know what works for us, it’s easy to overlook or ignore advice that we know doesn’t apply to us. It’s even easy to be a bit too strident with the advice we give. (I’m sure I’ve made this mistake myself, so I’m not looking to place blame, but rather I’m reminding us all of the power we have to influence others.)
I try to embrace the nuances in situations. My stories often explore the gray areas between good and evil. My editing and beta reading comments try to focus on information and suggestions rather than rules. My “Lost Your Pants?” workshop is built to work with many of those drafting methods above and is filled with “only do this step if it helps you” disclaimers.
It’s easy to think in black-and-white, good-and-bad, or pantser-and-plotter terms. Reality is more often somewhere in the middle. Let’s help new writers realize that this truth applies to writing too. *smile*
Registration is currently open for my workshop on how to do just enough story development to write faster, while not giving our pantsing muse hives. Interested? Sign up for “Lost Your Pants? The Impatient Writers Guide to Plotting a Story.” (Blog readers: Use Promo Code “savethepants” to save $15 on registration.)
Have you seen blog posts or workshops with advice you know to be misleading? Have you ever been led astray by bad advice? Have you experimented with different writing methods? How did you figure out what worked for you? Do you have other suggestions for how we can overcome “this is the best way” messages?Pin It
Agreed. Very good (non)advice. 🙂
I wonder if successful pansters aren’t simply natural plotters. They just don’t need to map it out on paper. Their innate talent maps it out as they go.
When I finally read Snyder’s Save the Cat and put my story to outline and scene cards, it matched his beat sheet surprisingly well.
Fwiw, I’m a hybrid. 🙂
That’s a good question and I don’t know the answer. 🙂 I know I have an innate sense of a story arc, and even my fanfic story (before I studied anything writing related) follows a beat sheet. But I don’t know if that natural instinct is normal for pantsers or not.
I pants all my stories now, but some have more planned concepts than others. 🙂 Thanks for the comment!
Me, too! *grin* Also a hybrid.
This is something I sometimes find myself having to stress to some of my clients, because they’ll be attempting to apply techniques…that are intended for something other than what they’re writing.
A natural too-thin writer trying to trim-trim-trim because that’s what the advice she reads says to do—advice written by a natural TMI writer. A pantser trying to force herself to plot. A omniscient POV technique applied to “close” third person limited (which is actually oddly common but I have yet to see it actually work).
But how’s the writer to know that the advice doesn’t apply to their situation if the advice’s author doesn’t tell them wherein the advice applies, or at least acknowledges that it doesn’t always apply?
Excellent examples! Yes, a new writer might not have the context yet to know that advice is situation-dependent. So either the advice-giver has to be clear about the situation (“If you have trouble with A, you might want to try B.”) or has to share those “this might not apply to you” disclaimers. Thanks for the great comment! 🙂
Bad advice? Oh yes. This reminded me of the creative writing teacher in high school who told us that we should avoid using the word “said” in dialogue. Even as a teenager I thought that seemed silly (it was easy enough to go to the library, grab a book by a Great Writer, and see the pages festooned with “He said” and “She said”), but I still see that one popping up on various writing forums.
There’s a kernel of good advice in there — I do think it’s good to occasionally replace “said” with other kinds of dialogue tags such as actions — but to suggest that people never use it? Really? Too often I think that leads to characters exploding and roaring and howling and doing other things that are far more jarring than a simple “She said” would have been.
As for pantsing vs. plotting, NaNoWriMo is going to be interesting for me this year. I pantsed my last two novels, but because the new one I’m going to write is the last one of the trilogy, I’ve actually done a bit of planning for it this time. I haven’t written out a whole synopsis or anything, but I’ve been sketching out a vague outline all year as various ideas come to me. I’ll be curious to see how this works out in November.
Ugh! Yes, I received some advice before about varying the beginning of sentences by using present participle phrases (“Running up the stairs, George shouted for help.”). Um, no. That usage is actually a mark of an amateur unless the sentence structure or content demands it. Like the bad advice you received, yes, it’s valid sometimes, but not valid as general advice for every situation.
Good point about how connected novels in a series might require more planning. As I mentioned in the post, I’ve taken a slightly different approach with each pantsed story (everything from a first line with no premise to having vague ideas for all the main turning points), so it’s good to experiment–or at least to recognize that we’re not locked in to only one method. Good luck with NaNo and thanks for the comment! 🙂
I didn’t realize that starting with present participle phrases was considered bad. Looks like I’m going to have to go back and change a lot of my story. 🙁
Oh my gosh, neither did I when I first started! I actually argued with the editors. LOL! But they gave their readers a simple assignment: Open a traditionally published book from about 5 years ago (back when editors possibly edited more than they do now) and count how many leading present participle phrases you find.
Darn it! I checked 5 books and some had virtually no leading PPPs, while others had about one a chapter. I think I found one that averaged a leading PPP every other page.
Nothing like my first draft with a leading PPP every other paragraph or so. 😀 Oops.
*sigh* I spent a whole day searching on *ing to edit my first story. Now they stand out to me so much I typically use 5 or less per story. LOL!
Using too many of them is a mark of an amateur because a high number shows that the author is using them for sentence variety (which isn’t their purpose) rather than for sentence clarity. I can certainly do a blog post about it if you think it would be a good idea. 🙂 Thanks for the comment!
I didn’t know this either. It’s a good thing I’m still working on my first draft. I think I’ll have to search for “ing” words.
A blog post would be a good idea, at least for me.
I did later do a blog post discussing this more. 🙂 I hope this helps.
Let me know if you have any questions. 🙂 Thanks for the comment!
Great post Jami! I’m working on the third draft of my first novel (which I pantsed, starting with a first line as my inspiration) and I’ve almost been brainwashed that it would have been better if I had plotted it. But I love the way the story unfolds in its own time, as much a surprise to me as anyone else by pantsing. I have considered a wee bit of plotting for book two, but I have no idea of the plot, lol. So I suspect you, me and Stephen King will just keep merrily pantsing along.
But you do bring up a great point. After I started the novel, I was immediately aware of what I don’t know about novel writing, and the more I read, the less free I felt to just throw out that first draft. I became afraid of doing it “wrong.”
I’m actually delighted with how it’s turning out and am about to pitch to two agents at a writing conference next month. Thanks for all your terrific articles!
Yes, it’s such a delicate balance to be open to learning new things and not constantly doubting ourselves about what we know. We have to trust ourselves when something is working for us while still being willing to see if something else will work better. It’s a tightrope walk, that’s for sure. 🙂 Good luck with your pitches and thanks for the comment!
Jimi Hendrix couldn’t read music and played his guitar upside down. He was almost certainly a pantser musician. You know he experimented because nobody had ever done what he did with a guitar. The analogy may not be apt because music, if not recorded, is gone once it’s played and the written word remains until it is edited away. But the point that there is no right way and the advice to experiment using the guidance of those more experienced should help set the muse free.
I think the key to your post, Jami, is that a writer has to be able to recognize when something is working and when something isn’t. New writers look for road maps because they tend to lack a sense of direction. The caution is that even a GPS can take you the wrong way.
LOL! So true! Thanks for sharing the great examples! 🙂
Great post, Jami. I so agree with you about Mr. Brooks. I have read Story Engineering, too, and I follow his blog, but I have to make an effort not to be offended by what his experience has taught him to be true.
Maybe pantsers are too laid back.
The only right way is the way the individual writer chooses, regardless of what that might be. Only time and experience can teach the writer what that write, er right, way is.
It’s all part of the process.
LOL! about pantsers being too laid back. That’s entirely possible. 🙂
And you’re right that discovering what works for us is all part of the process. 🙂 Thanks for the comment!
[…] I don’t know about you, but when I write I enlist a variety of methods to get my thoughts on the proverbial paper. I found this article in my in-box which rather clearly outlines why *ahem* outlines are integral parts of the writing process (bad pun, I know). I also read this nice piece this morning, so I’ve had outlines on the brain pretty much all day. https://jamigold.com/2013/08/writing-rule-1-there-is-no-one-right-way/ […]
Interesting that from your experience, people have been saying that plotting is better than pantsing. From what I’ve heard, people have always been insisting that PANTSING is superior to plotting. XDD I don’t know what kind of social circle I come from, lol! Thankfully, pantsing does work for me. Though at times I do “plot” a bit. Basically, I pants until I can’t pants anymore and then I plot. I plot until I can’t plot anymore and then I pants again, lol. Yes, as I’ve told you, this was one of the greatest lessons I’ve learned in writing, that you should never completely trust any one piece of “advice” (except for this one, lol!) I read a lot of story writing tip books when I was young and as a result collected a whole bunch of “rules”. Then as I grew older and read more books, I found MANY, MANY exceptions to their rules, where books could break those rules yet still be very enjoyable to read, or still very effective in conveying what they wanted to convey. So I learned not to trust any one rule. Some “rules” that I’ve seen (some I’ve shared with you already in the past): 1) The main character(s) must be 3D, complex, and developed. –>There are plenty of stories with pretty 2D and simple characters that I still enjoyed very much–AND I still managed to like and sympathize with these characters. (Flat characters are great for comic relief and satire, for instance.) 2)… — Read More »
Hi Serena, LOL! You just think pantsing is the “norm” because you hang out with me so much. 😉 Actually, I’m going by the sheer numbers of blog posts and workshops about plotting. I don’t think I’ve *ever* seen a workshop about pantsing (other than my “Lost Your Pants?” one), but every conference offers several workshops about plotting. From the simple fact of numbers and the kinds of results that show up under simplistic Google searches like “how to write a book,” new writers will be exposed to a lot more information about plotting than about pantsing. It’s funny that you mention your “pants ’til I can’t, plot ’til I can’t” approach, as that’s a lot like the plan “just enough” attitude I take in my workshop. 🙂 I say a lot of “don’t do this until/unless you need to” during the class. Wow! What a fantastic list of rules that don’t always apply as much as people say they do. And your explanations of the exceptions are wonderful. Like you’re absolutely right that (#1) comic relief characters are often non-3D. And with #5, I’ve found that my word counts for stories are all over the map because so much depends on the “chattiness” of the POV character’s voice. Some are naturally more expressive than others, and cutting those somewhat-extraneous words out would change their voice. With #8, plenty of non-chronological series use characters that don’t change or have an arc on any sort of deep, permanent level. With #10,… — Read More »
LOL! XD Why did I put in an extra #13 in there?! Haha.
Actually, I thought pantsing was the norm even before I started following your blog. I think it’s because there was a time when I hung out at a writer’s forum on fanfiction.net (yes 🙂 ), and it seemed that MOST of the writers there were pantsers. XD So I really believed that that was the norm, lol.
Yeah, exactly. I’m very oblivious to smells and tastes too (unless it’s in my mouth). Touch is much more accessible to me though. If “accessible” is the right word.
Oh yes! I’d bet many who write/post a chapter at a time on fan fiction forums are pantsers. Good point–thanks for the comment!
Couldn’t agree more. The more I learn about writing, the more I realize that many of these rules are just personal preferences by other writers. And I’ve discovered that most of these rules, even the ones I agree with, are usually only noticed by other writers. Non-writer readers, which comprise the vast majority of our intended audience, generally don’t notice these things at all.
I liked Larry Brooks’ books, but I do have to take some of his pronouncements with a grain of salt.
BTW, I loved Serena’s list.
Very true! Many of the craft rules are things that only other writers would ever be conscious of. For me, the main craft rule I pay attention to is “don’t take the reader out of the story.” That, in a nutshell, is why any of the other craft rules matter. 🙂 Thanks for the comment!
[…] the comments of my post about the number one writing rule, we shared some of the bad advice we’ve heard. Many of the examples didn’t point out […]
[…] is personal. Jami Gold reminds us that there is no single “right” way to write; Cynthia Lindeman talks about the creative delusion and why we must protect it at all costs; and […]
Have you seen blog posts or workshops with advice you know to be misleading? Yes, many, many times. Most of them, in fact. It got to the point where I started looking at what the writer’s background is. If they’ve published as a career writer and won prestigious awards, then I start paying more attention. Have you ever been led astray by bad advice? Have you experimented with different writing methods? How did you figure out what worked for you? Do you have other suggestions for how we can overcome “this is the best way” messages? Yes, I have been led astray. There are so many writers’ processes that are masquerading as technique. Technique tends to be very simple and easy. Process tends to complex and sometimes even gimmicky. I can only tell you what I did. Most people won’t want to do it because rules are comforting. People feel like if they stay inside the rules, they’ll have a chance of being successful, even if the rules are made up. 1. I threw out the rules. All of them. I’m working at trusting that the creativity will know what to do. 2. I’ve walked away from all the myths that the writing advice is full of. That’s harder than it sounds. There are are lot of myths. They usually start with “You can’t do X …” 3. I dropped off most of the writing blogs and stopped looking for tips. Tips tend to be more of the same problem.… — Read More »
Well stated! Yes, process can be very individual, and the trouble comes from trying to apply it to every situation as a set of rules. You’re also right about how and why people often like staying inside the rules.
I love your “rules.” 🙂 I think one reason I’ve tried learning all the grammar and craft stuff I can is so I can “throw out the rules” with confidence. So I definitely understand your attitude. LOL!
As you said, sometimes the hardest part is finding instructors who are qualified. I think I mentioned after RWA National last summer that I’m at the point in my craft knowledge where I don’t get anything out of most craft workshops at conferences. On the one hand that’s a good sign, but on the other, that makes it harder for me to push myself. Thanks for the great comment!
[…] Gold: Writing Rule #1: There Is No “One Right Way” “Every once in a while, I come across a blog post or a workshop description that makes me […]
Hi, Jami, thanks for recommending this post to me, just finished reading it. I think I’ve mentioned in my last post to you that I’ve been studying writing for years, and my research is never done. A writer can always learn new things about their craft. Just yesterday, I’ve come across quite a few writing biases from the only the best in the writing profession: Stephen King, On Writing—“The road to hell is paved with adverbs.” Ernest Hemingway on prose— “Prose is architecture, not interior decoration.” Khaled Hosseini—“About clichés. Avoid them like the plague.” William Faulkner on favoritism in writing—“In writing, you must kill all your darlings. Whenever you feel an impulse to perpetrate a piece of exceptionally fine writing, obey it whole-heartedly – and delete it before sending your manuscripts to press.” Writing biases are looked at and should be looked at by anyone who wants to understand how people see writing, and how people see mistakes in writing. A professional’s bias in writing should be a key thing to consider. There is no one way to write, but you must listen to other writer’s methods to learn how to write to begin with. I’ve done that. Now I just have to listen to myself.
Exactly. Those “always” or “never” instructions are often biased. For example, adverbs exist in our language for a reason. When they’re appropriate, I say they can be used. Can they be overused? Sure. But I don’t see anything wrong with them in moderation. 🙂
Yes, we can take in advice, but ultimately, we have to find what works for us and our voice. 🙂 Thanks for the comment!
[…] it comes to writing, there’s no “one right way.” We use different methods, take different paths, and have different goals. The same goes for […]
[…] fact, there’s never going to be a “one size fits all” guideline for any aspect of writin…. Every story is different, so some advice doesn’t apply to us. What’s right for one […]
[…] often point out how there’s no “one right way.” There’s no one right way to brainstorm, draft, or edit our book. There’s no one right […]
[…] about 7 years now (wow!), and there’s one thing that drives me crazier than anything else: advice implying that there’s only one right way to write (or do any part of the publishing process, […]
[…] We’ve also seen those who give advice—such as in writing workshops or classes—think their way of drafting or editing is the right way, sometimes the only way, even though there’s no such thing as “one right way” to write. […]
[…] feel like a failure if they take such guidelines as hard and fast “rules.” In reality, we each have to find the process that works for us. Sometimes that means we don’t avoid adverbs or cliches or any other of a hundred […]
[…] definitely not one right way to write. And my whole two-year-long series at Janice Hardy’s Fiction University was all about how […]
[…] I’ve written about before, there’s no “one right way” to do many things in writing. Therefore, just because a mentor thinks an approach is the […]