How Do You Decide on Your Author Brand – Part Two

by Jami Gold on January 6, 2011

in Writing Stuff

Girl with

Disclaimer: I love Maureen Johnson’s “I am not a brand” manifesto down to the last punctuation mark.  That’s not the approach to branding I’m talking about.

An author’s brand isn’t about selling.  It’s about recognizing that what we say and how we act affects what others think of us.  It’s about then taking an active role in shaping that impression.

Chuck Wendig had a great post yesterday that made a similar point:

Your platform is how people know you — it’s their perception of you as an author, but even more importantly, of you as a human being.

As we talked about last time, we all have different facets to our personality.  We show some more than others, but they are all essentially us.  Every time we interact with others, whether online or face-to-face, we decide which aspects to reveal.

For most of our lives, these choices have been made at an unconscious level.  Those who work in a technical field automatically switch between acronym salad with co-workers and non-geek-speak around grandparents.  However, by becoming conscious of those choices, we can more effectively mold how others perceive us.

Step One: How Do You Want to Be Perceived?

Yes, this brings back all that teenage “who am I?” angst and “What Color Is Your Parachute” type of thinking.  We need to think about what aspects are important to us.

  • What are you passionate about?
  • What aspects are reflected in your writing?
  • Do you have privacy or safety concerns?

Going back to Chuck Wendig’s post, he says:

Figure out who you are and who you want to be. … You are transitioning from Regular Human to Author Human. … [N]ow is a good time to slap a new coat of paint on who you want the world to see. … This should be the best and most interesting face of who you already are. No ruse, no illusion.

Analyze what makes you tick, what makes you excited, and what makes you uncomfortable.  Maybe take some of those online personality tests.

My friend Diana Paz from Twitter found a fun quiz to match your personality with a literary character.  I love my results, both for the fact that it picked a character from my favorite books and for the description:

You are Lucy from the Chronicles of Narnia by C.S. Lewis. You are trusting and intensely loyal. You would go to the ends of the earth for your friends and would never betray them.

The characteristics that generated my result are some I do consider integral to my being (seeing the best in people, helping others, not getting offended, and never wanting to be seen as a liar or a cheat).  That world-view likely shines through in my writing as well.  So those are great aspects for me to focus on in creating my brand.

Step Two: Incorporate Those Traits into Your Interactions

Oh wait, my brand (i.e. my blog and Twitter stream) probably embodies those traits already—because they are such a core part of my personality that my words and actions reflect them naturally.

And that’s my point.  Your brand isn’t a false representation of yourself, and it’s also not some limiting little box.  It’s you as you consciously choose to be.

If you want your brand to be all professional all the time, that’s your choice.  If you want to talk about your kids all the time, that’s your choice.  Make the choices that are right for you.

Does the fact that I consciously thought about how to answer the questions in my interview at Rachel Firasek’s blog make it less genuine?  I don’t think so.  Just because I answered in a way that reflected the impression I wanted to create doesn’t make any of it a lie.  The answers are still completely truthful—and me.

Did I share every story from my life?  No.  For one thing, that recitation would be too long for a memoir much less a blog post.  Also, not even my family knows everything about me.  Heck, I don’t know everything there is to know about me.

So of course I had to choose which things to share.  Making a conscious decision is not bad.  And not revealing everything about everything is not being false.

Authors choose certain words, sentence structures, setting details, or character movements for their books to create the desired response in the reader.  We can, and should, take that same approach to our brand.  What we choose and how we choose is our brand.

What aspects of your personality do you want people to see?  Does your brand reflect that?  Do you disagree with me—does making decisions consciously make them less genuine?

Pin It
58 Comments below - Time to Add your own.

RK Charron January 6, 2011 at 6:59 am

Hi Jami :)
That was an excellent post!
Thank you for incorporating the links too.
All the best,
RKCharron
…off to take the character personality quiz…

Reply

RK Charron January 6, 2011 at 7:06 am

Well…
It says I’m GANDALF
Wow.

Reply

Jami Gold January 6, 2011 at 7:57 am

Hi RK,

Gandalf? Oh cool! :) What’s the description for him?

Reply

Murphy January 6, 2011 at 7:08 am

Hi Jami!
Great post and yep, I totally agree with your character analysis. What a great way to look at how to brand yourself – I loved Chuck’s line too: This should be the best and most interesting face of who you already are.

Okay, you had to know I’d do the character quiz too. This is who it says I am:

You are Eowyn from the trilogy The Lord of the Rings. You are a strong woman who will not compromise your values. You stand up for those who are misunderstood and you are not afraid to fight. You are unafraid of death and to some you may seem mysterious.
Hmm…scary.

Thanks for posting this one!
Murphy

Reply

Jami Gold January 6, 2011 at 7:58 am

Hi Murphy,

Wow, that does sound like you. :) This is fun to hear everyone’s results.

Reply

Jami's Tech Guy January 6, 2011 at 7:18 am

Great post Jami! It’s all true, especially the no using “geek speak” around grandparents. We really learned this when we advertised in a local retirement community newsletter. But I digress…

To the point, while you’re specifically talking about authors, your message goes beyond the writing world. Everyone should consider the image they’re creating for themselves, especially online where your image is often formulated with incomplete pieces and snippets of what you say or write.

My number one goal for my online presence (and for my company) is to be perceived as competent and approachable. I chose to talk about my family online and have two primary reasons for this. First, most of my online clientele is female, by talking about my family they can be reassured that I’m not going to hit on them – tech geeks aren’t exactly known for their social skills. Second, I’m so happy with my family that I want to shout it to the world. Even so, I filter a lot. Not the bad/good but the stuff that makes us easily identifiable.

As to the test:
You are Superman. You are a hero who fights for justice and you have a strong sense of right and wrong. You stand up for the down-trodden and fight evil with all your strength. You are unafraid of death and to some you may seem mysterious.

Not bad but I’d rather my toughest challenge of the day be figuring out why a web site is slow over running into a burning building to save a scared child. I’d do the latter in a heartbeat but hope to never need to.

-TG
@jaytechdad

Reply

Katrina January 6, 2011 at 7:31 am

TG, you brand yourself fantastically. I’ve never worked with you, but after getting to know you on Twitter I know you’re uber-competent and very approachable. I’d also add: damn good human being.

Reply

Jami Gold January 6, 2011 at 8:01 am

Hi Tech Guy,

Great point about how this applies beyond just authors! And it’s good to know that I have a real superhero protecting my website. :)

Reply

Katrina January 6, 2011 at 7:22 am

Jami, you rock and your blog rocks. I love this post particularly because I’ve been thinking along similar lines.

Weirdly, deciding how I want to be perceived has helped me hidden parts of my personality shine through. For example, when I was in high school I was painfully shy. Most people took this as being snooty because I also got some of the best grades in the class. When I was with my one or two trusted friends, I made them laugh a lot and had a great time, but no one else saw this part of me. Then I went away on a week-long leadership trip to Valley Forge and DC, and I realized no one there knew me. I could be anyone I wanted because there were no expectations that I’d act a certain way. So I tested out a few jokes, made some people laugh, developed some great friendships, and came back a much more confident person. That was my junior year, and I really came out of my shell in time to enjoy my senior year.

As a writer, I make conscious decisions about what I want to post. I don’t want to be rude and negative. Sarcastic, yes, because that’s me and my humor. But I would NEVER aim that sarcasm at anyone else – at least, not unless they were a good friend and we had that sort of relationship. I’ve seen authors online who write rude, frustrated things and they aim barbs at other people. I will not buy their books. Ever. In my mind, they have branded themselves, and they’re a constant reminder to me to be a kinder person than I perhaps naturally am. The kinder I am online, the more naturally it comes to me in “real” life, and more than any other thing I’d like to be thought of as a decent, caring human being.

Reply

Jami Gold January 6, 2011 at 8:05 am

Hi Katrina,

Yes, I was going to make the same point you did about how being conscious of your decisions can affect your personality, but this post was already running long as it was. I’ll think about whether that deserves its own post. :)

So I agree with you 100%. Focusing on who we want to be can shape who we are in a “fake it ’til you make it” kind of way. Great comment – Thanks!

Reply

Jami's Tech Guy January 6, 2011 at 8:40 am

Thanks Katrina, I really appreciate your kind words. You’re a fabulous human being too, you help so many people in your day job. So yes, you’re right on target with your brand too. As to your sarcastic sense of humor, I love it.

Murphy: Looks like we had the same results with only the gender swapped. Heaven help anyone that gets on our combined bad side. :)

Jami: It’s wonderful to see how your blog has grown and the amazing community of brilliant people you’re attracting.

It’s also interesting to read just how many people here used a move or some other ‘life resetting event’ to remake their brand. I also did it as a kid when we moved cross country.

-TG
@jaytechdad

Reply

Jami Gold January 6, 2011 at 8:51 am

Thanks Tech Guy!

Yep, I love the writing community. :) And good observation on the life-resetting event as a trigger to re-evaluate who you are and who you want to be. That’s exactly what happened to me when I started high school. So yes, I first started consciously thinking of how I could shape others’ perceptions when I was 13.

Reply

Roni Loren January 6, 2011 at 8:51 am

Great post! And thanks for the Chuck Wendig link. That was great.

I don’t think making conscious decisions about your image means its not genuine. I just think it’s smart. It’s too important of a thing not to give real thought to it. : )

Reply

Jami Gold January 6, 2011 at 8:53 am

Hi Roni,

Yep, we make decisions about this stuff all the time without realizing it. Making them consciously only gives us more control. Thanks for the comment!

Reply

CMStewart January 6, 2011 at 9:08 am

I’ve been blogging as a fiction writer for less than a year, and am discovering more about my personal brand with each post. It’s a long process. Interacting on Twitter has also helped me identify my personal brand.

I agree that we as writers and authors should be thoughtful and selective when blogging, commenting, tweeting, et cetera. Just as I don’t show my entire personality to everybody in my offline life, I am discretionary when interacting online too. Interacting the same way with your friends, your spouse, your colleagues, and everybody else would be exhausting and silly IMO. And soon most of those people would start to look at you funny. lol

Reply

Jami Gold January 6, 2011 at 9:14 am

Hi CM,

You’re right, it’s a constant process of self-discovery. And my extended family already looks at me funny. :)

Did you take the test? It’s a fun one.

Reply

CMStewart January 6, 2011 at 11:39 am

Ha! Totally with you on the “funny looks.”

Did the quiz, but didn’t understand a couple of the questions. It said I was like an independent, visionary character out of Lord /Rings, name starts with a “G,” I think. Not a Lord / Rings fan.

Reply

Jami Gold January 6, 2011 at 1:21 pm

Hi CM,

Well, independent and visionary sound like you, so that works. :)

Reply

Diana Paz January 6, 2011 at 10:10 am

This is great advice, and definitely something I need to think about. Sometimes I have so much fun with social media I don’t remember that platform and perception is happening too *checks twitter timeline nervously*

That quiz was soooo funny! I was Galadriel from Lord of the Rings, as you know– TERRIBLE TO BEHOLD!!! Lol And I’m still jealous that you got Lucy. Those are some of my favorite books ever. *sighs* *tests out her elven magic* *contemplates eternity as an elven queen*

Reply

Jami Gold January 6, 2011 at 10:13 am

Hi Diana,

Oh, believe me, I have fun with Twitter too. :) That’s where I let more of my silly/dorky side out. And I’m okay with that being part of my image because that is part of who I am as well.

Don’t worry. Magic? Elf? Eternity? Queen? You’re all good.

Reply

Kiersten Krum January 6, 2011 at 1:15 pm

Hi Jami! I’m really enjoying these posts – especially as I have the time to read them and not just print out for later. People talk about how, in publishing especially, a “voice” is essential. Just like a brand, a strong voice distinguishes itself on the page very quickly and, if compelling, keeps readers glommed to the page. The trick is translating that voice into your branding/marketing platform. Yeah, still figuring that one out.

Oh, and here’s my literary character:

You are Karen Blixen from the book Out of Africa by Isak Dinesen. You are a strong woman with an adventurous nature. You can hold your own and aren’t afraid to speak your mind.

They only forgot to mention the tendency to snark.;-)

Reply

Jami Gold January 6, 2011 at 1:20 pm

Hi Kiersten,

Great, I’m glad they’re helpful to you! (And don’t worry, I understand about having no time.)

Oh, I like your results. Very nice. :) Maybe there just aren’t enough snarky literary characters to refer to. Thanks for the comment!

Reply

Piper Bayard January 6, 2011 at 1:20 pm

Hi Jami. Great blog. I think finding your brand, or your voice, is one of the most difficult aspects to marketing yourself as a writer. It says I’m a Peter Pan, by the way. A free spirit and a bit of a rebel who lives in the moment. Guilty. Thanks for the great post. All the best.

Reply

Jami Gold January 6, 2011 at 1:23 pm

Hi Piper,

Free spirit? Rebel? Oh, that totally sounds like you. :) Thanks for the comment!

Reply

Andrew Mocete January 6, 2011 at 1:45 pm

I’m still working on my brand. Like you said, the hard part is knowing which aspect of your personality to present and which is TMI.

I’m Sherlock Holmes. You are smart, witty, and love a challenge. You use rationality and reason in all things and don’t let your heart rule your head. You are measured and stable and you don’t let people push you around. That made my friggin’ day.

Reply

Jami Gold January 6, 2011 at 1:49 pm

Hi Andrew!

Good to see you here. Yep, that’s a good way to put it – balancing the well-rounded, “I’m a relatable person” stuff with TMI. :)

And I love your test result. That does sound like you. I’m just grinning with all these great descriptions. Thanks for the comment!

Reply

Todd Moody January 6, 2011 at 3:43 pm

Hi Jami! Great post! I started blogging for this very reason, but so far my personoa is mostly “writer who writes about writing stuff”. Not sure where I want to go with it yet. I think I’m hoping ot sell a boatload of books and have a following pop up all by itself, LOL. Not very realistic, but I guess I’m not too worried about it at this stage. I make good money in my paying job and will have a comfortable retirement to sustain me in my writing career. If I only sell 500 books I guess I’ll still keep on plugging away at it.

My character was: You are Sam Gamgee from the trilogy The Lord of the Rings. You are a gentleman and intensely loyal. You would go to the ends of the earth for your friends and would never betray them.

I’m more loyal now as an older guy, but I definitely treasure integrity.

I love your blog Jami!

Reply

Jami Gold January 6, 2011 at 3:59 pm

Hi Todd,

Happy to help! And don’t worry, I don’t really have a grand plan either. I just make stuff up as I go along. :)

Reply

Rachel Firasek January 6, 2011 at 3:44 pm

Okay, I’m so glad I know you. You should really consider writing a non-fiction social media book. Not kidding! Here’s my quiz results. *winks* I kind of like what it says about me!

You are Galadriel from the trilogy the Lord of the Rings by J.R.R. Tolkien. Recently played by Cate Blanchett in the epic movie trilogy directed by Peter Jackson, you are a strong woman and you know what you want. You are a visionary with grand ideas.

The Lord of the Rings is an epic trilogy which is often considered to portray the mythic past of England. Published in three volumes in 1954 and 1955, the story is part of the mythology that Tolkien had been working on in 1917. Another well-known work that precedes this is The Hobbit.

Reply

Jami Gold January 6, 2011 at 4:02 pm

Hi Rachel,

Great results! And I’m glad I know you too. :)

Reply

Suzanne Johnson January 7, 2011 at 6:01 am

Amazing post, Jami! I think as authors we become “public figures” so we have to be conscious in our decision-making (even if it’s a decision to be more spontaneous, if that makes sense)! Oh, and I am Hermione from Harry Potter. (Geek! But a nice geek!)

Reply

Jami Gold January 7, 2011 at 7:59 am

Hi Suzanne,

Absolutely that makes sense. :) I’ve made a decision to be “myself” in the comments of my blog (complete with smiley faces everywhere – LOL! (And LOLs, can’t forget those)) and keep the posts themselves more professional. So I guess you could say that I’ve decided to not hold myself back as much here in comment-land. Anyone that knows me in real life knows that I am that smiling and laughing. That old axiom about not using “she smiled/laughed” as a dialogue tag because a person can’t talk and smile/laugh at the same time? Um, I beg to differ. :)

Oh, and Hermione? That is so cool! Love it!

Reply

Kelli January 7, 2011 at 12:39 pm

Mine said that I’m Juliet. I think it’s on the money. Here’s what it said.

You are Juliet from Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. You are a romantic, but are not afraid to stand up for what you want. While you believe in happily ever after you are no damsel in distress and have a strong mind.

Reply

Jami Gold January 7, 2011 at 12:47 pm

Hi Kelli,

Yes, so many of these entries seem oddly accurate for such a short quiz. :) Sounds like a great result for you. Thanks for the comment!

Reply

Daisy Harris January 7, 2011 at 7:45 pm

Can’t believe I missed this until now! I’ve been thinking a lot about branding in the New Year. A particular aspect of branding I’m trying to embrace lately is the idea of polarization- that in identifying what you are, you must identify what you are not.

I’m a people pleaser, and I always want to find common ground, so this has been hard for me. But lately I’ve noticed that the more clearly I state who I am and what I stand for, the more people respond to me.

A great podcast I recently watched said, “yeah, if you take a strong stand, you may lose a few people. But those people you didn’t want anyway. They were not your target customers. If you take a stand, the people who ARE your target customers will glom on to you forever.”

Anyway, this is long winded, but the point is important. It’s not just about deciding what your brand is, it’s also deciding what your brand isn’t.

Cheers!
D

Reply

Jami Gold January 7, 2011 at 8:00 pm

Hi Daisy,

Great point! Yes, deciding not to reveal/focus on certain aspects of your personality isn’t just about privacy issues, but also about whether or not that fits with your brand. Thanks for stopping by. :)

Reply

Michele Shaw January 7, 2011 at 8:19 pm

Great post! I think people tend to forget that every tweet, blog post, and fb post contributes to their brand. Perceptions form the minute you step into any form of SM. What’s important, at least for me, is being myself and not trying to put up a false, overly formal persona. I have fun. I crack jokes. Life isn’t all business, though I hope to convey how serious I am about my writing . It comes down to balance and being secure enough in yourself to put the real you out there. According to the quiz, I am Hermione from HP :)

Reply

Jami Gold January 7, 2011 at 8:26 pm

Hi Michele,

Yep, it’s a different way of looking at branding. Whether you intend to have a brand or not, everything you do contributes to others’ perception – which is your brand in their eyes. And that’s an interesting point about trying to balance being your (silly/goofy/etc.) self and still convey how you’re serious about writing.

And Hermione? That’d probably be my second thought of what my result would be. :) Thanks for the comment!

Reply

52 Faces January 10, 2011 at 8:00 pm

LOVE this post! (Roni Loren pointed me to Kristen Lamb who pointed me here)

I’ve been trying to decide whether to blog with my real name (or use a penname at least) to start social networking pre-querying. (I would have to start a new blog.)

My fear is having my work life find me and seeing photos of my personal life. On the other side, my fear is not being able to post photos of my personal life or posts about my real opinions for fear of offending people. I already censor myself so much in my blog (I’m so utterly unPC in real life) that if I go completely public I feel like I’d have to water down my personality. Thoughts?

I got Galadriel, btw. :)

Reply

Jami Gold January 10, 2011 at 9:49 pm

Hi 52 Faces,

I’m so glad you found this post helpful. If you’ve gone through Kristen’s blog, you know she warns that pen names aren’t the witness protection program. So you can’t expect a pen name to protect you completely. However, I think they can be a great way to attempt to keep things separate. Then with your pen name, you would create your brand.

Reply

Susan Bischoff January 12, 2011 at 9:16 am

I agree with you: thinking about what you want to portray, or even who you want to be, doesn’t make being that, or showing that, less genuine. (I think I’ll be hitting a Clauseholics’ Anonymous meeting after this.)

Some of my ‘who I am’ keywords may be getting me into trouble. Helpful, honest. In an attempt to show ‘this is where I am, this is where you may be headed,’ I may also be showing keywords like neurotic and whiny which are not so much where I want to be–especially whiny.

I’ve hit that point on my blog where I have regular visitors and I talk to them through the posts as well as in the comments, and while it’s real (part of who I want to be), it’s probably starting to veer into unprofessional (part of how I don’t want to be seen). I may be a little too comfortable in my space right now.

And, on the other hand, maybe this fits. Maybe it is the most interesting part of who I am. I’m an intensely emotional and fairly neurotic person, and I write with that. When people come back from reading my book and they say stuff like, “You really made me remember what it felt like…” or “I really connected with…” Well, that’s how that happens.

I don’t know. Probably part of why I took so well to writing teens is because I’m still trying to figure out who I am.

Reply

Jami Gold January 12, 2011 at 9:44 am

Hi Susan,

That’s an interesting observation about why you write for teens. :) I try to forget that part of my life.

As I mentioned in an earlier comment, my writing style and brand is more casual in my comments and tweets than in my blog posts. Does that mean I’m too comfortable in those arenas, or does it mean those are both part of who I am? I think the latter. My blog posts, by their very nature, have to be more in teacher-mode than conversation-mode. I can interact on both levels in person and my writing merely reflects that, I think. Thanks for the insightful comment!

Reply

Susan Bischoff January 12, 2011 at 9:54 am

I think that my earlier posts were usually much…straighter, where I would be in one mode in the post itself and then more personable in the comments–if there were any. Then I felt a definite shift in my writing style, and my posts probably became more like the rest of my writing. Not good or bad, just how it evolved for me.

Reply

Jami Gold January 12, 2011 at 10:24 am

Hmm, so more rambling perhaps? ;) But don’t worry, I wouldn’t call your posts whiney.

Reply

Mercedes January 13, 2011 at 4:00 pm

Yes yes YES! Especially on the “being you but a better you” part. My persona is…perhaps a little wonky. But it’s me. It’s who I am. My stiletto collection is a real thing. I really do have several knives. I adore true crime, I’ve been trained in physical restraint, etc etc. But I’m not home seducing strangers and throwing assailants to the ground. I’m baking star-shaped lemon cakes, for crying out loud, and I love that it’s part of my persona as well.

You are fabulous and I adore you and your amazing blog posts. :D

Reply

Jami Gold January 13, 2011 at 4:09 pm

Mercedes,

LOL! You totally rock the homemaker/assassin persona. And I adore you too, my friend. :)

Reply

Jessi February 5, 2011 at 4:40 pm

I read Chuck’s post and yours and you both make very good points about a writer’s platform, although you touched my analytical side, and Chuck, well he had me laughing after you fall down in a large crowd kind of reaction. Funny quiz to post too. I got the same as CM, Galadriel from the Lord of the Rings. I come up with grand ideas!

Reply

Jami Gold February 5, 2011 at 5:53 pm

Hi Jessi,

Thanks for the comment! Grand ideas? That sounds like you have lots of inspiration for stories. :)

Reply

Serena Yung September 24, 2013 at 3:09 pm

I got Galadriel: “you are a strong woman and you know what you want. You are a visionary with grand ideas.”
From looking at the comments above, Galadriel is not at all uncommon! XD

Oh and when I changed my gender to male whilst keeping all my responses the same, I got Gandalf:
“You are a visionary with grand ideas and courage to match. You are thoughtful and often spend more time thinking about the future than the present.”

Lol! I guess the above descriptions are kind of true, but I read the different results others got, and I can see myself in them too. For instance, the Galadriel/Gandalf didn’t mention how much I love my friends and treasure loyalty. :) And I also like fighting for what I think is right.

Good point about how we can be conscious of what we’re conveying to others, and even adjust this, but that we can still convey our REAL selves at the same time, so it doesn’t have to be hypocritical.

Oh yes, when people read your stories, esp. if they read several of them, they’d gradually get a feel for who you are and how you’re like. It’s fun when your personality, what you value, or what you care most about changes throughout though. For instance, when I was younger, I used to write in a more sympathetic way, but last year, my style became really sarcastic and satirical, and now I’m still a little on the “making fun of everyone” side (though not technically “satirical”) but with a bit more sympathy again. So people will have a hard time figuring out whether I’m a more sympathetic or a more satirical person. XD

What can be annoying though is that some stories can convey wrong impressions of you. Your main character’s behavior and beliefs can lead readers to believe that YOU have this kind of behavior and beliefs too, eek. Like if you write in the first person narrative of this protagonist who is an incestuous pedophile, people may think that you have secret/hidden incestuous/pedophilic desires in you. O_O But at the same time, I feel that it’s inevitable that some works would convey wrong impressions, and it might not be good to change the story just for the sake of giving readers the right impression of you. I’m thinking of Nabokov’s Lolita. What a loss it would be to the world if he changed that story! XD

Reply

Jami Gold September 24, 2013 at 6:32 pm

Hi Serena,

Yes, it will be interesting to see what people think my worldview is. I often purposely write characters with opposite worldviews from me, especially in regards to politics or religion. I like the challenge and I like how it forces me to see more of those nuances and not think “a” is good and “b” is bad. :) Thanks for the comment!

Reply

Taurean Watkins October 28, 2013 at 4:20 pm

I took the quiz for a lark, and I got Gandalf, which surprises me only because I tend to pegged as the “Sagely” type a lot when I take these quizzes. It also didn’t help that among the choices available, what I answered was often my second choice, but my first wasn’t available.

That said, I’m too impulsive and persnickety to be a proper mentor.

That may change later, but that’s where I’m at now.

The results say-

“You are Gandalf from the trilogy the Lord of the Rings by J.R.R. Tolkien. You are a visionary with grand ideas and courage to match. You are thoughtful and often spend more time thinking about the future than the present.”

The last part of this is more true than I like admitting, but it’s also why I was so worried about you earlier in the year when you posted this-

http://jamigold.com/2013/05/does-good-news-make-you-worry

Reply

Jami Gold October 28, 2013 at 4:48 pm

Hi Taurean,

Yes, I’ll admit I tend to overthink things and I’m not always the best at embracing happiness to its fullest. I should probably take some lessons from my characters on that. :)

I can definitely see you as a visionary though! You often see things from a very insightful perspective. :) Thanks for the comment!

Reply

What do you think?

58 Comments below - Time to Add your own.

Previous post:

Next post: